RGTI vs. TFLO
RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) is a stock, while TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. Over the past 5 years, RGTI returned 7.55%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for TFLO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
RGTI vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -36.34% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 2.04% return.
RGTI
- 1D
- -7.54%
- 1M
- -31.69%
- 6M
- -42.91%
- YTD
- -36.34%
- 1Y
- -14.86%
- 3Y*
- 88.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
RGTI vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -36.34% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 2.04% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.99% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTI and TFLO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTI vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank
RGTI
TFLO
RGTI vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTI | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -46.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 12.34 | -11.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 199.41 | -199.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.28 | 766.50 | -766.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTI vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and TFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTI | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.89% | -5.01% | -91.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.10% | -0.02% | -77.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | -0.04% | -78.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.89% | -0.13% | -96.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.97% | 0.00% | -74.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.98% | -0.10% | -58.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.77% | 0.01% | +53.76% |
Volatility
RGTI vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison
Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.10%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTI | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.32% | 0.10% | +21.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.22% | 0.20% | +71.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.25% | 0.29% | +108.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 129.54% | 0.36% | +129.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.56% | 0.45% | +126.11% |
Dividends
RGTI vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison
RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.84% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTI and TFLO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to TFLO (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs TFLO's -5.01%.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.67 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTI and TFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer