PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTI vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RGTI is traded in USD, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 17.02% return.


RGTI

1D
8.20%
1M
27.17%
YTD
2.48%
6M
-3.53%
1Y
99.12%
3Y*
173.46%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*

CMB1.L

1D
1.03%
1M
6.84%
YTD
17.02%
6M
18.75%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
16.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
2.48%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
17.02%54.68%11.37%37.57%-13.87%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and CMB1.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTI vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTICMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.35

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

11.77

-9.78

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and CMB1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTICMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.89%

-57.87%

-39.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-11.25%

-65.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-17.48%

-61.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

-35.65%

-61.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.71%

0.00%

-59.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.84%

-19.36%

-39.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.12%

3.20%

+46.92%

Volatility

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 45.22% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) at 4.73%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTICMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.22%

4.73%

+40.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.54%

13.97%

+57.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.45%

17.22%

+92.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.07%

21.24%

+107.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.16%

22.73%

+104.43%

Dividends

RGTI vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTI nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTI and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTI and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer