PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGSVX vs. GAGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGSVX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly lower than GAGEX's 33.96% return.


RGSVX

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
12.29%
6M
11.59%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

GAGEX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
33.96%
6M
30.60%
1Y
53.08%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGSVX
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund
12.29%26.02%2.19%3.64%-5.85%12.09%12.33%26.21%-7.94%17.05%
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
33.96%16.88%-1.75%2.66%34.32%45.96%-34.12%10.45%-18.96%-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RGSVX and GAGEX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between RGSVX and GAGEX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGSVX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGSVX
RGSVX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RGSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RGSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GAGEX
GAGEX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GAGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGSVXGAGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

6.45

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

19.92

-9.60

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the GAGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGSVX and GAGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGSVXGAGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.99

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.74

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.24

+0.39

Drawdowns

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGSVX drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum GAGEX drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGSVX and GAGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGSVXGAGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-78.90%

+43.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-8.53%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-23.67%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-26.42%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-4.80%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-29.23%

+23.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.75%

-0.77%

Volatility

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) is 3.73%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that RGSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGSVXGAGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

7.20%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

14.91%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

18.43%

-7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

23.61%

-9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

27.31%

-11.67%

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGSVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGSVX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison

RGSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than GAGEX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
2.11%2.82%7.08%4.33%0.15%2.59%3.59%1.91%1.72%1.40%1.13%1.33%
RGSVX
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund
2.76%3.00%4.04%4.78%4.90%4.65%3.79%2.99%2.79%2.20%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGSVX and GAGEX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAGEX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to RGSVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGSVX dropped -35.19% vs GAGEX's -78.90%.

GAGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGSVX and GAGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer