PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAGEX vs. BGLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAGEX achieves a 33.96% return, which is significantly higher than BGLYX's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GAGEX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.39% annualized return.


GAGEX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
33.96%
6M
30.60%
1Y
53.08%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
7.37%

BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
33.96%16.88%-1.75%2.66%34.32%45.96%-34.12%10.45%-18.96%-1.04%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GAGEX and BGLYX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between GAGEX and BGLYX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAGEX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAGEX
GAGEX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GAGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAGEXBGLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

2.19

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.92

7.21

+12.71

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAGEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the BGLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAGEX and BGLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAGEXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.31

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.51

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.48

-0.24

Drawdowns

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAGEX drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGEX and BGLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAGEXBGLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.90%

-36.54%

-42.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-6.32%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.67%

-14.56%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-20.94%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-36.54%

-33.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-4.48%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.23%

-7.85%

-21.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.92%

+0.83%

Volatility

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) at 3.58%. This indicates that GAGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAGEXBGLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

3.58%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

8.55%

+6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

10.54%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

13.60%

+10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

15.64%

+11.67%

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAGEX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAGEX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison

GAGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than BGLYX's 28.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
GAGEX
Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund
2.11%2.82%7.08%4.33%0.15%2.59%3.59%1.91%1.72%1.40%1.13%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAGEX and BGLYX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAGEX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to BGLYX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAGEX dropped -78.90% vs BGLYX's -36.54%.

GAGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAGEX and BGLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer