RGLO vs. GSG

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - RGLO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. RGLO is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, RGLO returned 24.03% vs 38.08% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. RGLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.

Performance

RGLO vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLO achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 34.43% return.

RGLO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• 6M: 8.60%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSG

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 1.37%
• 6M: 28.74%
• YTD: 34.43%
• 1Y: 38.08%
• 3Y*: 15.01%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLO vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	10.75%	17.96%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	34.43%	8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLO and GSG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

RGLO vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 70
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLO vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGLO	GSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.63	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.23	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.03	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	6.88	+3.97

RGLO vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLO and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGLO vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLO drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLO and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGLO	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-89.62%	+80.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-18.81%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-59.41%	+58.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.21%	-63.69%	+62.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	5.55%	-3.33%

Volatility

RGLO vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is 3.53%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that RGLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGLO	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	7.37%	-3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	21.54%	-10.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	23.48%	-10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.95%	22.80%	-9.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	22.00%	-9.05%

RGLO vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGLO vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	0.00%	0.00%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.57%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGLO and GSG in my portfolio?

RGLO and GSG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGLO or GSG?

GSG has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to RGLO (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLO dropped -9.61% vs GSG's -89.62%.

Which ETF is better, RGLO or GSG?

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 38.08% vs 24.03% for RGLO. On fees, RGLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RGLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGLO or GSG?

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 38.08% return vs 24.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGLO or GSG?

RGLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGLO or GSG?

RGLO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

What is the main difference between RGLO and GSG?

RGLO is categorized as Global Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Russell and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RGLO and 0.75% for GSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.