PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGLD vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGLD vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -10.20% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 121.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 10.07%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 33.34% annualized return.


RGLD

1D
-2.31%
1M
0.02%
6M
-24.35%
YTD
-10.20%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
16.03%

MRVL

1D
2.32%
1M
-31.04%
6M
137.84%
YTD
121.03%
1Y
133.87%
3Y*
42.13%
5Y*
25.86%
10Y*
33.34%
ALL TIME*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.42B$5.28B$10.40B
$133.30M$134.04M$155.03M

RGLD vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-10.20%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%0.04%-12.13%44.27%5.53%31.32%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
121.03%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and MRVL is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.12

The correlation between RGLD and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGLD:

$16.83B

MRVL:

$164.26B

EPS

RGLD:

$8.21

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

RGLD:

24.15

MRVL:

64.76

PEG Ratio

RGLD:

1.64

MRVL:

0.12

PS Ratio

RGLD:

11.72

MRVL:

18.77

PB Ratio

RGLD:

2.27

MRVL:

9.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGLD:

$1.31B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGLD:

$579.68M

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGLD:

$949.59M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGLD vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGLD vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGLDMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.31

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.79

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

8.95

-7.11

RGLD vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than MRVL's maximum drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGLDMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.29%

-91.60%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-48.35%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.17%

-60.79%

+22.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.73%

-61.88%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

-61.88%

+12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.54%

-40.71%

+6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.83%

-46.63%

+16.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.52%

15.14%

+2.38%

Volatility

RGLD vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 9.95%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 27.33%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGLDMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

27.33%

-17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.80%

65.31%

-33.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.83%

77.92%

-38.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.81%

63.78%

-31.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.63%

52.85%

-19.22%

Dividends

RGLD vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than MRVL's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.13%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.95%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Financials

RGLD vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RGLD vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Gold, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGLD and MRVL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to RGLD (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGLD and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer