PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGLD vs. BYRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGLD vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGLD achieves a -10.89% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -76.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RGLD has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 10.64%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.


RGLD

1D
-0.98%
1M
-3.55%
6M
-19.39%
YTD
-10.89%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
10.64%

BYRN

1D
-1.90%
1M
-40.08%
6M
-77.79%
YTD
-76.98%
1Y
-83.17%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
-28.95%
10Y*
4.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGLD vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-10.89%70.43%10.39%8.70%8.51%0.04%-12.13%44.27%5.53%31.32%
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-76.98%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RGLD and BYRN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGLD:

$13.66B

BYRN:

$87.68M

EPS

RGLD:

$8.21

BYRN:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

RGLD:

11.63

BYRN:

0.84

PB Ratio

RGLD:

2.26

BYRN:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGLD:

$1.31B

BYRN:

$108.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGLD:

$579.68M

BYRN:

$57.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

RGLD:

$949.59M

BYRN:

-$3.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGLD vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGLD vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGLDBYRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.69

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

-0.99

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-1.65

+3.25

RGLD vs. BYRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the BYRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGLD and BYRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGLD vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGLD drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than BYRN's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGLD and BYRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGLDBYRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.29%

-92.51%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

-86.01%

+49.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.66%

-88.70%

+52.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.73%

-92.51%

+51.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.55%

-92.51%

+42.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.04%

-88.70%

+53.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.83%

-52.50%

+22.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.27%

51.63%

-36.36%

Volatility

RGLD vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) is 11.47%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 46.46%. This indicates that RGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGLDBYRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

46.46%

-34.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.10%

74.13%

-42.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.26%

82.31%

-43.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

75.22%

-43.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.65%

96.16%

-62.51%

Dividends

RGLD vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison

RGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.95%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Financials

RGLD vs. BYRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Gold, Inc. and Byrna Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
469.13M
16.39M
(RGLD) Total Revenue
(BYRN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RGLD vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Gold, Inc. and Byrna Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April0
10.9%
Portfolio components
RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGLD and BYRN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (46.46%) compared to RGLD (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGLD dropped -98.29% vs BYRN's -92.51%.

RGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGLD and BYRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer