RGEF vs. WDIV
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while WDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 34.99% vs 29.03% for WDIV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.
Performance
RGEF vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than WDIV's 5.92% return.
RGEF
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
RGEF vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 6.35% | 25.37% | -1.25% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 5.92% | 27.16% | -4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and WDIV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between RGEF and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
WDIV
RGEF vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEF | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 3.02 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 4.32 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.54 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.61 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 14.05 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEF | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 3.02 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.46 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum WDIV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and WDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -42.34% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -8.61% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.34% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -5.90% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.21% | +0.01% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 4.29%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 4.29% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 7.41% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 9.70% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 12.70% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.40% | +1.58% |
RGEF vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than WDIV's 4.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.94% | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.13% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |