RGEF vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 31.08% vs 29.24% for VT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

RGEF vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return.

RGEF

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 6M: 14.81%
• 1Y: 31.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGEF vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	13.96%	25.37%	-1.25%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RGEF and VT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.95

The correlation between RGEF and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGEF vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGEF

RGEF Risk / Return Rank: 70
RGEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RGEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RGEF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RGEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RGEF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGEF vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGEF	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.31	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.20	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	3.04	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.03	13.53	+0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGEF vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGEF and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGEF	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	2.31	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.44	+1.01

Drawdowns

RGEF vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGEF	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-50.27%	+34.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-9.67%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.88%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-7.02%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.17%	+0.05%

Volatility

RGEF vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGEF	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	3.83%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.11%	10.17%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.77%	12.70%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	16.05%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.80%	17.23%	-0.43%

RGEF vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGEF vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF	0.88%	0.92%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGEF and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, RGEF and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RGEF or VT?

RGEF has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEF dropped -16.01% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, RGEF or VT?

On 1-year performance, RGEF leads with 31.08% vs 29.24% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGEF or VT?

Over the 1-year period, RGEF has performed better with a 31.08% return vs 29.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGEF or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RGEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGEF or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.88% for RGEF.

What is the main difference between RGEF and VT?

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RGEF and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.