RGEF vs. SPGM
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while SPGM is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 34.99% vs 37.52% for SPGM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
RGEF vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGEF having a 6.35% return and SPGM slightly lower at 6.06%.
RGEF
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 37.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
RGEF vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 6.35% | 25.37% | -1.25% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 6.06% | 23.62% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and SPGM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RGEF and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
SPGM
RGEF vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.85 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 3.89 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.53 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 4.11 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 18.58 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.85 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.64 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and SPGM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -33.97% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -9.50% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -4.85% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.10% | +0.12% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) have volatilities of 6.61% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 6.37% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 10.27% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 13.30% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 16.01% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 17.56% | -0.58% |
RGEF vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SPGM's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.94% | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.78% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |