RGEF vs. PID
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 34.99% vs 26.99% for PID. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
RGEF vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.40% return.
RGEF
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 26.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
RGEF vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 6.35% | 25.37% | -1.25% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.40% | 24.45% | -6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and PID is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between RGEF and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
PID
RGEF vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEF | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.83 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 4.17 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.85 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 14.89 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEF | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.83 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.27 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and PID.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -66.34% | +50.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -7.47% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.24% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -13.10% | +11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.93% | +0.29% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 3.82%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 3.82% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 7.18% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 9.63% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 13.97% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 17.92% | -0.94% |
RGEF vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.94% | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |