RGEAX vs. GWOAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RGEAX (Russell Investments Global Equity Fund) and GWOAX (GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RGEAX returned 12.17%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for GWOAX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RGEAX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for GWOAX.

Performance

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGEAX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 17.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGEAX having a 12.17% annualized return and GWOAX not far behind at 12.08%.

RGEAX

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 6.97%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.80%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: 12.17%
• ALL TIME*: 7.70%

GWOAX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 11.87%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 1Y: 35.41%
• 3Y*: 18.71%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 12.08%
• ALL TIME*: 8.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund	10.18%	20.92%	15.25%	22.12%	-16.78%	22.30%	12.95%	25.89%	-9.41%	22.83%
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	17.69%	28.37%	6.14%	22.49%	-14.10%	18.53%	10.53%	26.56%	-12.95%	25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RGEAX and GWOAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.94

The correlation between RGEAX and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGEAX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGEAX

RGEAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
RGEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RGEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RGEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RGEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RGEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

GWOAX

GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 93
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGEAX	GWOAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.63	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.63	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.47	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.86	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.50	15.33	-5.83

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGEAX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGEAX drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than GWOAX's maximum drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEAX and GWOAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGEAX	GWOAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.78%	-49.84%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-8.78%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.24%	-16.11%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.91%	-26.21%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-35.28%	+0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	0.00%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.07%	-8.93%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.21%	-0.07%

Volatility

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.27%. This indicates that RGEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGEAX	GWOAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	3.27%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	10.21%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	12.89%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	15.23%	+1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	16.39%	+0.69%

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGEAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGEAX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

RGEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than GWOAX's 5.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	5.37%	4.46%	0.60%	6.10%	7.27%	12.75%	3.85%	4.33%	3.02%	3.05%	6.43%	12.47%
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund	7.56%	8.33%	7.28%	1.04%	1.67%	6.85%	29.97%	13.77%	15.65%	13.13%	8.21%	11.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGEAX and GWOAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, RGEAX and GWOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RGEAX or GWOAX?

RGEAX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to GWOAX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEAX dropped -56.78% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.