PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGCYX vs. REAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGCYX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than REAYX's 11.88% return.


RGCYX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.41%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
4.44%

REAYX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
11.88%
6M
11.43%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGCYX
Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund
2.29%8.69%7.34%11.22%-11.40%2.71%3.73%11.98%-3.22%6.44%
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
11.88%14.66%11.90%12.50%-8.86%27.01%9.06%29.57%-8.60%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RGCYX and REAYX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.36

The correlation between RGCYX and REAYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGCYX vs. REAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGCYX
RGCYX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RGCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RGCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

REAYX
REAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
REAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
REAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) and Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGCYXREAYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.41

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.59

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.72

13.72

+2.00

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGCYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the REAYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGCYX and REAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum REAYX drawdown of -36.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGCYX and REAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGCYXREAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.48%

-36.87%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-6.66%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.75%

-20.66%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

-20.66%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-4.91%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.74%

-1.27%

Volatility

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) is 0.64%, while Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that RGCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGCYXREAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

3.41%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

7.79%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

10.41%

-8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.46%

16.78%

-13.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

18.53%

-14.36%

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGCYX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than REAYX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGCYX vs. REAYX - Dividend Comparison

RGCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than REAYX's 13.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
13.43%15.24%15.38%13.55%19.72%10.47%3.61%1.86%45.26%14.47%0.00%0.00%
RGCYX
Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund
5.84%5.77%5.35%4.83%4.78%4.60%3.85%6.91%5.89%4.53%4.61%4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGCYX and REAYX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REAYX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to RGCYX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGCYX dropped -19.48% vs REAYX's -36.87%.

RGCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGCYX and REAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer