RGCYX vs. RTDYX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RGCYX (Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund) and RTDYX (Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - RGCYX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Russell, while RTDYX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Russell. Over the past 10 years, RGCYX returned 4.46%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for RTDYX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGCYX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTDYX.

Performance

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGCYX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than RTDYX's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RGCYX has underperformed RTDYX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while RTDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.

RGCYX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 7.00%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 4.46%

RTDYX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 9.92%
• 6M: 8.84%
• 1Y: 24.43%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: 14.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGCYX Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund	2.17%	8.69%	7.34%	11.22%	-11.40%	2.71%	3.73%	11.98%	-3.22%	9.84%
RTDYX Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund	9.92%	16.05%	22.01%	24.92%	-16.48%	27.22%	13.88%	30.27%	-7.16%	21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RGCYX and RTDYX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.38

The correlation between RGCYX and RTDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RGCYX vs. RTDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGCYX

RGCYX Risk / Return Rank: 91
RGCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RGCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RGCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RGCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RGCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

RTDYX

RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 65
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGCYX	RTDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.13	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.98	2.91	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.39	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	3.09	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.19	13.87	+1.32

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGCYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the RTDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGCYX and RTDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum RTDYX drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGCYX and RTDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGCYX	RTDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.48%	-37.43%	+17.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.02%	-8.33%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.75%	-37.43%	+34.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.72%	-37.43%	+20.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.48%	-37.43%	+17.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-5.41%	+5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-6.29%	+3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	1.85%	-1.38%

Volatility

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund (RGCYX) is 0.59%, while Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that RGCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGCYX	RTDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	4.42%	-3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.85%	9.42%	-7.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	12.10%	-9.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.46%	24.47%	-21.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.17%	22.14%	-17.97%

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGCYX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RTDYX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGCYX vs. RTDYX - Dividend Comparison

RGCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than RTDYX's 31.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGCYX Russell Investments Opportunistic Credit Fund	5.85%	5.77%	5.35%	4.83%	4.78%	4.60%	3.85%	6.91%	5.89%	4.53%	4.61%	4.21%
RTDYX Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund	31.81%	35.18%	31.60%	4.66%	6.03%	6.51%	3.44%	6.62%	11.47%	7.65%	1.79%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGCYX and RTDYX in my portfolio?

RGCYX and RTDYX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGCYX or RTDYX?

RTDYX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to RGCYX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGCYX dropped -19.48% vs RTDYX's -37.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.