PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REAYX vs. RFCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) and Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REAYX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than RFCYX's 0.44% return.


REAYX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
11.88%
6M
11.43%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*

RFCYX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
11.88%14.66%11.90%12.50%-8.86%27.01%9.06%29.57%-8.60%13.19%
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
0.44%7.55%1.11%4.92%-14.07%-1.55%8.98%9.57%-0.54%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between REAYX and RFCYX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.00

Over the past year, REAYX and RFCYX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REAYX vs. RFCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REAYX
REAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
REAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
REAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RFCYX
RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) and Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REAYXRFCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

1.66

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

4.56

+9.16

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the RFCYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REAYX and RFCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REAYX drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, which is greater than RFCYX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REAYX and RFCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REAYXRFCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.87%

-19.34%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-2.92%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.66%

-6.33%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.66%

-19.34%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-3.48%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-3.38%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.06%

+0.68%

Volatility

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Equity Income Fund (REAYX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) at 1.17%. This indicates that REAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REAYXRFCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

1.17%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

2.77%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

3.78%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

5.97%

+10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

5.01%

+13.52%

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REAYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than RFCYX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

REAYX vs. RFCYX - Dividend Comparison

REAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.43%, more than RFCYX's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REAYX
Russell Investments Equity Income Fund
13.43%15.24%15.38%13.55%19.72%10.47%3.61%1.86%45.26%14.47%0.00%0.00%
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
5.23%5.18%4.89%2.77%2.77%2.13%7.15%3.70%2.41%1.29%4.92%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


REAYX and RFCYX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REAYX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to RFCYX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REAYX dropped -36.87% vs RFCYX's -19.34%.

REAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REAYX and RFCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer