RGAGX vs. ABNFX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX).
RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973. ABNFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 4, 2008.
Performance
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | -7.99% | 20.08% | 28.41% | 37.66% | -30.53% | 19.67% | 38.30% | 29.22% | -2.88% | 26.53% |
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | -0.55% | 7.42% | 1.42% | 4.29% | -13.08% | -0.88% | 10.86% | 8.08% | 0.15% | 3.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGAGX achieves a -7.99% return, which is significantly lower than ABNFX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RGAGX has outperformed ABNFX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while ABNFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.95% annualized return.
RGAGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
ABNFX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGAGX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ABNFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGAGX vs. ABNFX — Risk / Return Rank
RGAGX
ABNFX
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGAGX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.90 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.52 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 4.34 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGAGX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.90 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.00 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.40 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGAGX and ABNFX is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Dividend Comparison
RGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.95%, more than ABNFX's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 11.95% | 10.99% | 9.29% | 7.70% | 4.44% | 8.49% | 4.57% | 7.93% | 12.36% | 7.34% | 6.95% | 9.22% |
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | 4.01% | 4.37% | 4.55% | 3.19% | 2.37% | 2.07% | 5.15% | 3.72% | 2.65% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGAGX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than ABNFX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGAGX and ABNFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGAGX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.19% | -17.69% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -2.94% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -17.65% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.19% | -17.69% | -18.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.64% | -2.65% | -7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -3.30% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 1.03% | +2.59% |
Volatility
RGAGX vs. ABNFX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that RGAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGAGX | ABNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 1.49% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 2.49% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.00% | 4.39% | +16.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 5.91% | +14.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 4.87% | +14.77% |