RFV vs. VUSE
RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) and VUSE (Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while VUSE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Vident U.S. Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFV returned 12.53%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for VUSE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VUSE.
Performance
RFV vs. VUSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than VUSE's 9.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFV having a 12.53% annualized return and VUSE not far behind at 12.38%.
RFV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
VUSE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
RFV vs. VUSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 13.04% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
VUSE Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 9.45% | 13.18% | 15.77% | 24.36% | -9.42% | 35.46% | 6.76% | 20.74% | -15.25% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and VUSE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RFV and VUSE has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RFV vs. VUSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RFV
VUSE
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RFV
VUSE
Financial Services
RFV
VUSE
Energy
RFV
VUSE
Technology
RFV
VUSE
Industrials
RFV
VUSE
Consumer Defensive
RFV
VUSE
Basic Materials
RFV
VUSE
Real Estate
RFV
VUSE
Healthcare
RFV
VUSE
Communication Services
RFV
-
VUSE
Utilities
RFV
-
VUSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFV vs. VUSE — Risk / Return Rank
RFV
VUSE
RFV vs. VUSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFV | VUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.00 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 7.45 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFV | VUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.54 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RFV vs. VUSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than VUSE's maximum drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and VUSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFV | VUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.82% | -43.92% | -27.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -9.28% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.65% | -18.93% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -21.34% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -43.92% | -8.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.86% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -5.62% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 2.48% | +1.75% |
Volatility
RFV vs. VUSE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) at 2.99%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFV | VUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 2.99% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 9.49% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 12.64% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 17.46% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 20.21% | +4.78% |
RFV vs. VUSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFV vs. VUSE - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than VUSE's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
VUSE Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% | 0.84% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFV and VUSE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VUSE (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs VUSE's -43.92%.
On 10-year performance, RFV leads with 12.53% vs 12.38% for VUSE. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VUSE has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RFV has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 12.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VUSE.
RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.44% for VUSE.
RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VUSE is Mid Cap Value Equities. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while VUSE tracks Vident U.S. Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vident. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 0.50% for VUSE.
VUSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFV and VUSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer