RFLR vs. QGRD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFLR returned 26.24% vs 20.58% for QGRD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QGRD.

Performance

RFLR vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFLR achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than QGRD's 11.09% return.

RFLR

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.87%
• 6M: 10.93%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 1Y: 26.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRD

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: 9.04%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFLR vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	14.16%	10.82%
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF	11.09%	8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RFLR and QGRD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	0.54

The correlation between RFLR and QGRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFLR vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 85
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QGRD

QGRD Risk / Return Rank: 51
QGRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QGRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QGRD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QGRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QGRD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFLR vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFLR	QGRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.41	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.92	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.25	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	2.20	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.00	6.67	+9.33

RFLR vs. QGRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the QGRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFLR and QGRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFLR vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFLR drawdown since its inception was -15.48%, which is greater than QGRD's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFLR and QGRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFLR	QGRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.48%	-9.41%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.79%	-9.41%	+3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-3.60%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-2.23%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	3.09%	-1.45%

Volatility

RFLR vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) is 3.54%, while Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that RFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFLR	QGRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	6.71%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	11.61%	-2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	14.66%	-1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.27%	14.60%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.27%	14.60%	-2.33%

RFLR vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFLR vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison

RFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than QGRD's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF	1.41%	1.57%	0.00%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.59%	0.67%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFLR and QGRD in my portfolio?

RFLR and QGRD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFLR or QGRD?

QGRD has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to RFLR (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFLR dropped -15.48% vs QGRD's -9.41%.

Which ETF is better, RFLR or QGRD?

On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 26.24% vs 20.58% for QGRD. On fees, QGRD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RFLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFLR or QGRD?

Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 26.24% return vs 20.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFLR or QGRD?

QGRD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFLR or QGRD?

QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.59% for RFLR.

What is the main difference between RFLR and QGRD?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RFLR and 0.85% for QGRD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.