RFLR vs. PJAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) and PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - RFLR is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Innovator, while PJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. RFLR is actively managed, while PJAN is passively managed. Over the past year, RFLR returned 25.97% vs 14.71% for PJAN. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PJAN.

Performance

RFLR vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFLR achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's 5.13% return.

RFLR

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJAN

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFLR vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	7.99%	11.81%	2.29%
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	5.13%	11.29%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RFLR and PJAN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.64

The correlation between RFLR and PJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFLR vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 72
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PJAN

PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 79
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFLR vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFLR	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.55	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.75	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.54	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	3.19	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.89	17.03	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RFLR vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFLR and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFLR	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.55	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.90	+0.19

Drawdowns

RFLR vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFLR drawdown since its inception was -15.48%, smaller than the maximum PJAN drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFLR and PJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFLR	PJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.48%	-21.25%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.79%	-4.63%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.26%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-1.73%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	0.87%	+0.77%

Volatility

RFLR vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) at 1.07%. This indicates that RFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFLR	PJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	1.07%	+2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	4.71%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	5.81%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	8.93%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	10.60%	+1.59%

RFLR vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFLR vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

RFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while PJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFLR and PJAN in my portfolio?

RFLR and PJAN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFLR or PJAN?

RFLR has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to PJAN (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFLR dropped -15.48% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

Which ETF is better, RFLR or PJAN?

On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 25.97% vs 14.71% for PJAN. On fees, PJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFLR or PJAN?

Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFLR or PJAN?

PJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFLR or PJAN?

RFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for PJAN.

What is the main difference between RFLR and PJAN?

RFLR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while PJAN is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RFLR and 0.79% for PJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.