RFIX vs. ILS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS).

RFIX and ILS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFIX is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Dec 9, 2024. ILS is an actively managed fund by Brookmont. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025.

Performance

RFIX vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RFIX vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF	12.33%	-30.68%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.04%	5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 1.04% return.

RFIX

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 6M: -3.00%
• 1Y: -20.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFIX vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

ILS

Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF

RFIX

Simplify Bond Bull ETF

Return for Risk

RFIX vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIX

RFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3
RFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
RFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
RFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIX vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFIX	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.79	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFIX	ILS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.74	1.92	-2.66

Correlation

The correlation between RFIX and ILS is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

RFIX vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than ILS's 8.15% yield.

	TTM	2025
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF	4.67%	5.07%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.15%	6.06%

Drawdowns

RFIX vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFIX	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.79%	-1.56%	-37.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.52%	0.00%	-29.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.03%	-0.28%	-22.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RFIX	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.19%	3.53%	+28.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.27%	3.53%	+28.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.27%	3.53%	+28.74%