PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFIX vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFIX vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than HEQT's 4.95% return.


RFIX

1D
0.99%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
7.97%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-14.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQT

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.79%
YTD
4.95%
6M
5.64%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFIX vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
7.97%-28.43%-12.32%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.95%10.08%-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RFIX and HEQT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFIX vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIX
RFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIX vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFIXHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.49

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

2.94

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

13.45

-14.45

RFIX vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIX and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFIXHEQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

2.34

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

1.09

-1.84

Drawdowns

RFIX vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFIXHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-11.51%

-27.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-5.09%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.25%

-0.06%

-32.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.11%

-2.79%

-21.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

1.11%

+13.59%

Volatility

RFIX vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 0.81%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFIXHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

0.81%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

5.27%

+15.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.75%

6.38%

+23.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.90%

8.48%

+22.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.90%

8.48%

+22.42%

RFIX vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HEQT's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFIX vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than HEQT's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.19%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
4.63%5.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFIX and HEQT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to HEQT (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.90% vs -14.76% for RFIX. On fees, RFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.90% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HEQT.

RFIX has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.

RFIX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while HEQT is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RFIX and 0.53% for HEQT.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFIX and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer