RFIX vs. BIL
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. RFIX is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -14.76% vs 3.87% for BIL. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. RFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
RFIX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -14.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
RFIX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 7.97% | -28.43% | -12.32% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 4.15% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and BIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
BIL
RFIX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -20.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -174.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 87.91 | -86.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 355.35 | -355.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 2,817.77 | -2,818.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 19.71 | -20.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 2.78 | -3.53 |
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -0.78% | -38.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -0.01% | -25.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | 0.00% | -32.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -0.26% | -23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 0.00% | +14.70% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 0.05% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 0.13% | +20.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 0.20% | +29.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 0.26% | +30.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 0.26% | +30.64% |
RFIX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFIX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.63% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and BIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 1-year performance, BIL leads with 3.87% vs -14.76% for RFIX. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BIL has performed better with a 3.87% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RFIX.
RFIX has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.
RFIX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RFIX and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer