RFIX vs. AMAX
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -15.77% vs 5.50% for AMAX. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for AMAX.
Performance
RFIX vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than AMAX's 0.60% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- -15.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.51%
AMAX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $319.31K | $260.04K | $341.45K | |
| $6.74M | $8.71M | $16.93M |
RFIX vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.85% | -28.43% | -12.22% |
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 0.60% | 11.38% | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and AMAX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
AMAX
RFIX vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFIX | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.67 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 1.51 | -2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than AMAX's maximum drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and AMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -16.28% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -7.53% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.21% | -5.89% | -28.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.89% | -5.32% | -19.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.18% | 3.34% | +8.84% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) at 2.40%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | AMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 2.40% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.46% | 8.85% | +11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 10.70% | +18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 10.43% | +20.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 10.43% | +20.20% |
RFIX vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFIX vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than AMAX's 11.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 11.89% | 9.18% | 7.36% | 6.99% | 11.22% | 1.00% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.36% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and AMAX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to AMAX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs AMAX's -16.28%.
On 1-year performance, AMAX leads with 5.50% vs -15.77% for RFIX. On fees, RFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMAX has performed better with a 5.50% return vs -15.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.
AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 4.36% for RFIX.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RFIX and 1.29% for AMAX.
AMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and AMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer