PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFIMX vs. PXQSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
3.56%1.99%11.52%9.14%-24.26%30.58%44.44%24.94%-0.56%
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
0.43%-4.50%9.63%19.10%-24.29%19.50%28.16%24.87%-1.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIMX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than PXQSX's 0.43% return.


RFIMX

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
3.56%
6M
4.61%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*

PXQSX

1D
2.17%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
-0.34%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFIMX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQSX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFIMX vs. PXQSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIMX
RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PXQSX
PXQSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PXQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFIMXPXQSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.01

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

0.16

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.02

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.06

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.44

0.13

+5.31

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFIMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the PXQSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIMX and PXQSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFIMXPXQSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.01

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

-0.02

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.36

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between RFIMX and PXQSX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Dividend Comparison

RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than PXQSX's 5.79% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFIMX
Ranger Micro Cap Fund
1.28%1.33%0.00%0.77%47.82%71.79%0.00%0.00%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
5.79%5.81%4.90%2.99%3.37%1.76%0.82%0.80%2.54%5.32%8.89%7.58%

Drawdowns

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIMX drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than PXQSX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIMX and PXQSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFIMXPXQSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-55.56%

-43.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-13.25%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.41%

-31.49%

-67.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.22%

-13.69%

-85.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.74%

-10.29%

-17.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.85%

-2.41%

Volatility

RFIMX vs. PXQSX - Volatility Comparison

Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) at 5.71%. This indicates that RFIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFIMXPXQSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

5.71%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

11.75%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.37%

19.73%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8,947.93%

20.22%

+8,927.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7,423.79%

20.45%

+7,403.34%