RFI vs. RLTY
RFI (Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund) is REIT fund managed by Cohen & Steers, while RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, RFI returned 7.36%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for RLTY. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
RFI vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFI achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than RLTY's 13.69% return.
RFI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.92%
RLTY
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26M | $1.13M | $1.28M | |
| $847.93K | $984.15K | $858.81K |
RFI vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund | 9.31% | 3.55% | 6.63% | 4.36% | -7.98% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 13.69% | 8.56% | 15.40% | 14.05% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFI and RLTY is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between RFI and RLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFI vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank
RFI
RLTY
RFI vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.18 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 3.93 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFI vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFI drawdown since its inception was -73.67%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFI and RLTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.67% | -35.44% | -38.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -11.40% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.18% | -20.81% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -1.91% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -13.28% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 3.42% | +0.81% |
Volatility
RFI vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 3.27%. This indicates that RFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFI | RLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.27% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 10.45% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 13.08% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 22.45% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 22.45% | +2.70% |
Dividends
RFI vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison
RFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, which matches RLTY's 8.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund | 8.35% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 8.17% | 10.02% | 6.82% | 7.61% | 6.63% | 8.93% | 7.52% | 7.93% | 10.36% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 8.30% | 8.98% | 8.93% | 9.18% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFI and RLTY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFI has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to RLTY (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFI dropped -73.67% vs RLTY's -35.44%.
RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFI and RLTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer