PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFI vs. PDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFI vs. PDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFI achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 15.44% return.


RFI

1D
0.27%
1M
0.01%
YTD
6.94%
6M
7.82%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
6.68%

PDX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
15.44%
6M
18.05%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
24.85%
5Y*
21.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFI vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RFI
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
6.94%3.55%6.63%4.36%-22.13%39.21%-0.79%21.45%
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
15.44%-10.59%36.99%44.51%23.02%68.79%-44.20%-9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RFI and PDX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between RFI and PDX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFI vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFI
RFI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
RFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFI Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PDX
PDX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFI vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFIPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.34

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

0.78

-0.15

RFI vs. PDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the PDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFI and PDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFI vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFI drawdown since its inception was -73.67%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFI and PDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFIPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.67%

-80.63%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-15.65%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.93%

-37.24%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.38%

-37.24%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-16.15%

+11.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.10%

-18.82%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

6.86%

-2.74%

Volatility

RFI vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) at 2.61%. This indicates that RFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFIPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

2.61%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

10.23%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

14.25%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

25.57%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

36.41%

-11.25%

Dividends

RFI vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison

RFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, less than PDX's 21.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
21.92%24.34%6.31%4.30%5.89%5.28%14.11%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFI
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
8.47%8.69%8.29%8.17%10.02%6.82%7.61%6.63%8.93%7.52%7.93%10.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFI and PDX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFI has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to PDX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFI dropped -73.67% vs PDX's -80.63%.

PDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFI and PDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer