RFFC vs. TOLZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ).
RFFC and TOLZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. TOLZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2014.
Performance
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% | 21.02% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.27% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.27% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
TOLZ
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.94 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.14 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 10.58 | -2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.42 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and TOLZ is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and TOLZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -39.33% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -8.82% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -21.85% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.16% | -3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -6.70% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.79% | +0.81% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.63%. This indicates that RFFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.63% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 7.29% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 12.97% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 13.90% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 16.30% | +1.75% |