RFFC vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
RFFC and SCHX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
RFFC vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% | 21.02% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | -4.45% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's -4.45% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
SCHX
RFFC vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.96 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.46 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.49 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 6.98 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.96 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.80 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and SCHX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SCHX's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and SCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -34.33% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -12.19% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -25.41% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -6.40% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.00% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.60% | 0.00% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.31% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.64% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 18.33% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 17.14% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 18.13% | -0.08% |