RFEU vs. EWN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RFEU (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF) and EWN (iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF) are both Europe Equities funds. RFEU is actively managed, while EWN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFEU returned 8.10%/yr vs 14.24%/yr for EWN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFEU charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWN.

Performance

RFEU vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 20.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RFEU has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 8.10%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return.

RFEU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 13.93%
• 3Y*: 12.26%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 8.10%

EWN

• 1D: -3.91%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 20.24%
• 6M: 20.65%
• 1Y: 34.25%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: 14.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFEU First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF	1.50%	30.78%	-1.78%	16.19%	-24.17%	22.83%	6.25%	23.21%	-17.57%	26.58%
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF	20.24%	34.87%	1.67%	22.08%	-24.43%	22.74%	23.23%	32.45%	-15.37%	33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and EWN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between RFEU and EWN has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFEU vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFEU	EWN
Financial Services	18.9%	17.9%
Industrials	15.4%	11.4%
Healthcare	13.3%	2.5%
Technology	12.5%	34.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	10.1%
Energy	8.7%	2.0%
Utilities	6.4%	-
Communication Services	3.8%	9.6%
Basic Materials	1.2%	5.1%
Real Estate	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

RFEU vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU

RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 67
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

EWN

EWN Risk / Return Rank: 53
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 47
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFEU	EWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.64	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.33	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.29	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.60	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.26	9.83	+1.44

RFEU vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and EWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFEU	EWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.74%	-65.22%	+25.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.15%	-13.24%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.48%	-19.77%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.92%	-43.57%	+7.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.74%	-43.57%	+3.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-4.14%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.57%	-16.32%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	3.49%	-2.14%

Volatility

RFEU vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFEU	EWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	8.69%	-8.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.51%	18.07%	-14.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.39%	21.06%	-12.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	23.14%	-6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	21.23%	-3.70%

RFEU vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFEU vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than EWN's 4.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF	4.18%	5.03%	2.18%	1.79%	1.98%	1.01%	0.78%	2.57%	2.40%	1.68%	2.71%	1.92%
RFEU First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF	2.83%	2.87%	5.45%	3.37%	4.98%	1.82%	2.32%	3.08%	2.84%	1.35%	3.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFEU and EWN in my portfolio?

RFEU and EWN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFEU or EWN?

EWN has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs EWN's -65.22%.

Which ETF is better, RFEU or EWN?

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 14.24% vs 8.10% for RFEU. On fees, EWN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFEU or EWN?

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFEU or EWN?

EWN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFEU or EWN?

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 2.83% for RFEU.

What is the main difference between RFEU and EWN?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.50% for EWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.