PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEM vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


RFEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.27%
YTD
21.66%
6M
23.54%
1Y
45.49%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
21.66%27.71%10.85%20.78%-19.05%0.97%8.19%20.33%-18.80%35.73%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and FTXL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.61

The correlation between RFEM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFEM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEM
FTXL

Technology

35.8%
99.5%

Financial Services

20.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
0.5%

Energy

6.6%

-

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Healthcare

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

RFEM
35.8%
FTXL
99.5%

Financial Services

RFEM
20.4%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RFEM
11.4%
FTXL

-

Industrials

RFEM
7.9%
FTXL
0.5%

Energy

RFEM
6.6%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

RFEM
5.7%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

RFEM
4.0%
FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

RFEM
3.4%
FTXL

-

Healthcare

RFEM
2.7%
FTXL

-

Utilities

RFEM
1.4%
FTXL

-

Real Estate

RFEM
0.7%
FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM
RFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEMFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.78

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

15.62

-11.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

58.28

-42.29

RFEM vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEMFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

6.33

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.97

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.94

-0.42

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEMFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.22%

-43.87%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-14.51%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-41.57%

+25.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

-43.87%

+9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-10.56%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.88%

-1.03%

Volatility

RFEM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is 6.86%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that RFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEMFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

14.28%

-7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

28.98%

-14.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

35.94%

-19.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

36.02%

-18.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

34.25%

-14.44%

RFEM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
1.68%1.98%3.64%3.28%7.74%3.21%1.22%3.75%2.37%1.62%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to RFEM (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEM dropped -42.22% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 8.99% for RFEM. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RFEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.

RFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

RFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEM and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer