PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEM vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEM vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.


RFEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.27%
YTD
21.66%
6M
23.54%
1Y
45.49%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEM vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
21.66%27.71%10.85%20.78%-19.05%0.97%8.19%20.33%-18.80%35.73%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.77%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and AIRR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.50

The correlation between RFEM and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFEM vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEM
AIRR

Technology

35.8%
0.5%

Financial Services

20.4%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
84.6%

Energy

6.6%
3.8%

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Healthcare

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

RFEM
35.8%
AIRR
0.5%

Financial Services

RFEM
20.4%
AIRR
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEM
11.4%
AIRR

-

Industrials

RFEM
7.9%
AIRR
84.6%

Energy

RFEM
6.6%
AIRR
3.8%

Communication Services

RFEM
5.7%
AIRR

-

Basic Materials

RFEM
4.0%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

RFEM
3.4%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

RFEM
2.7%
AIRR

-

Utilities

RFEM
1.4%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

RFEM
0.7%
AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEM vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM
RFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEM vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEMAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.41

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

5.05

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

18.68

-2.69

RFEM vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEMAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.01

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.67

-0.15

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, roughly equal to the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEMAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.22%

-42.37%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-13.09%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-27.95%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

-27.95%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.86%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-7.43%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.53%

-0.68%

Volatility

RFEM vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is 6.86%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that RFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEMAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

7.87%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.37%

19.82%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

25.40%

-8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

25.29%

-7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.81%

26.29%

-6.48%

RFEM vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEM vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
1.68%1.98%3.64%3.28%7.74%3.21%1.22%3.75%2.37%1.62%3.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEM and AIRR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to RFEM (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEM dropped -42.22% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.40% vs 8.99% for RFEM. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RFEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.

RFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

RFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.70% for AIRR.

RFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEM and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer