RFDA vs. IOO
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).
RFDA and IOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000.
Performance
RFDA vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFDA vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | -4.50% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's -4.50% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
IOO
RFDA vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFDA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 2.09 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.18 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 10.38 | -1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFDA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.85 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.36 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and IOO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFDA vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than IOO's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and IOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -55.85% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -12.40% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -23.52% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -6.82% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -11.34% | +7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.61% | -0.12% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 4.32%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 6.26% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 10.69% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 19.22% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.97% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.74% | -0.81% |