RFCI vs. VGMS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS).

RFCI and VGMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. VGMS is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jun 9, 2025.

Performance

RFCI vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RFCI vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	-0.21%	4.00%
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	-0.28%	5.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly higher than VGMS's -0.28% return.

RFCI

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 4.13%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: —

VGMS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -1.38%
• YTD: -0.28%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCI vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.

RFCI

RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF

VGMS

Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF

Return for Risk

RFCI vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCI

RFCI Risk / Return Rank: 55
RFCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RFCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RFCI Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RFCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RFCI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCI vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFCI	VGMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFCI	VGMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	2.08	-1.66

Correlation

The correlation between RFCI and VGMS is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RFCI vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than VGMS's 3.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	4.51%	4.55%	4.30%	3.55%	2.26%	3.45%	2.04%	2.66%	2.76%	2.03%	1.97%
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	3.83%	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RFCI vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, which is greater than VGMS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and VGMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFCI	VGMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-2.46%	-11.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-1.51%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-0.27%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RFCI	VGMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.04%	3.12%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.10%	3.12%	+1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	3.12%	+1.84%