PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFAYX vs. WFBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFAYX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than WFBIX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RFAYX has underperformed WFBIX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while WFBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.96% annualized return.


RFAYX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
1.59%

WFBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.38%7.47%1.57%4.85%-14.80%-1.09%9.10%9.03%-0.56%3.57%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.43%7.16%1.43%9.65%-13.03%-1.79%7.40%8.72%-0.08%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RFAYX and WFBIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.93

The correlation between RFAYX and WFBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFAYX vs. WFBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFAYX
RFAYX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RFAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RFAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

WFBIX
WFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
WFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFAYXWFBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.78

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

5.34

+0.62

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFAYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the WFBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFAYX and WFBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFAYXWFBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.36

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.16

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.38

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.94

-0.19

Drawdowns

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFAYX drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum WFBIX drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFAYX and WFBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFAYXWFBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-18.68%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-3.02%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-6.09%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.61%

-17.84%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-18.68%

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-1.50%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.26%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.00%

-0.09%

Volatility

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFAYXWFBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.34%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

2.83%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

3.97%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

6.40%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

5.17%

-0.27%

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFAYX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than WFBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFAYX vs. WFBIX - Dividend Comparison

RFAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than WFBIX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
5.43%5.19%4.74%3.71%1.25%2.50%5.27%3.46%2.67%1.57%5.45%4.09%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.91%3.78%3.68%6.82%2.60%2.04%2.43%2.88%2.71%2.24%2.25%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RFAYX and WFBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WFBIX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to RFAYX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFAYX dropped -19.61% vs WFBIX's -18.68%.

RFAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFAYX and WFBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer