PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REZ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REZ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, REZ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 6.81%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


REZ

1D
1.85%
1M
0.19%
YTD
11.57%
6M
12.05%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
6.81%

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REZ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
11.57%4.80%12.73%10.97%-28.31%47.86%-6.62%24.49%3.89%3.87%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between REZ and SLV is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REZ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REZ
REZ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
REZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
REZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
REZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REZ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REZSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

3.16

+1.32

REZ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REZ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REZ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REZSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.87%

-76.28%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-47.23%

+38.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-47.23%

+28.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-47.23%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-47.23%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-47.23%

+46.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-44.65%

+31.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

21.91%

-19.02%

Volatility

REZ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) is 6.03%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that REZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REZSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

14.34%

-8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

59.27%

-47.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

60.33%

-45.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

36.59%

-17.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

32.09%

-10.51%

REZ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REZ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

REZ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
2.06%2.74%2.26%2.94%3.37%1.81%3.17%2.90%3.63%3.57%5.55%3.18%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REZ and SLV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to REZ (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 12.68% vs 6.81% for REZ. On fees, REZ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, REZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REZ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

REZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

REZ is categorized as REIT, while SLV is Silver. REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REZ and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REZ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer