REXC vs. RNWZ
REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. REXC is passively managed, while RNWZ is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REXC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNWZ.
Performance
REXC vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REXC
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNWZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REXC vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 7.90% |
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | -2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between REXC and RNWZ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REXC vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank
REXC
RNWZ
REXC vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REXC | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.61 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
REXC vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REXC drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum RNWZ drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REXC and RNWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REXC | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -24.90% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -4.46% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -7.19% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility
REXC vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REXC | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.48% | 15.06% | +34.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.48% | 16.99% | +32.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.48% | 16.99% | +32.49% |
REXC vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
REXC vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison
REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 2.36% | 3.87% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REXC and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REXC is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REXC is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.
RNWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.75% for RNWZ.
Find the right allocation for REXC and RNWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer