PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBAT vs. HYDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBAT vs. HYDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBAT vs. HYDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
18.93%32.09%-13.19%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
14.01%43.73%-16.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBAT achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than HYDR's 14.01% return.


IBAT

1D
3.41%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
18.93%
6M
21.28%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYDR

1D
5.63%
1M
-7.11%
YTD
14.01%
6M
8.23%
1Y
121.47%
3Y*
-11.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBAT vs. HYDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HYDR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBAT vs. HYDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBAT
IBAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBAT vs. HYDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBATHYDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.47

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.05

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

3.93

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.36

9.45

+2.91

IBAT vs. HYDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the HYDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBAT and HYDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBATHYDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.47

+1.20

Correlation

The correlation between IBAT and HYDR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBAT vs. HYDR - Dividend Comparison

IBAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than HYDR's 3.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
0.97%1.15%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
3.35%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%

Drawdowns

IBAT vs. HYDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBAT drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum HYDR drawdown of -89.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBAT and HYDR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBATHYDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-89.28%

+61.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-29.76%

+16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-73.82%

+66.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-64.40%

+56.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

12.36%

-7.46%

Volatility

IBAT vs. HYDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is 10.76%, while Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that IBAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBATHYDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

13.75%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

38.28%

-18.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.78%

49.47%

-23.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

46.25%

-23.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

46.25%

-23.40%