PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
REW vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

REW vs. IGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REW returned -45.16%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for IGM. At a correlation of -0.95, they often move in opposite directions. REW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.

Performance

REW vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -48.44% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, REW has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of -45.16%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.

REW

1D
2.13%
1M
-32.71%
YTD
-48.44%
6M
-47.77%
1Y
-65.29%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-40.21%
10Y*
-45.16%

IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REW vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology		-48.44%-43.15%-33.70%-61.35%65.72%-53.61%-71.34%-56.83%-10.02%-49.11%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF		31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between REW and IGM is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007

-0.95

The correlation between REW and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort Technology

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

Often compared with REW:
REW vs. TECSREW vs. ^VVIXREW vs. XLKREW vs. VXXREW vs. SPYREW vs. ^GSPCREW vs. SSG
Often compared with IGM:
IGM vs. QQQIGM vs. VGTIGM vs. IYWIGM vs. XLKIGM vs. IXNIGM vs. VOOIGM vs. IETC

Return for Risk

REW vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
REW
REW Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
REW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REW Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
REW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
REW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
REW Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REW vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

REWIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.56
3.07

-4.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-3.03
3.78

-6.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.50

-0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.81

-4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

13.36

-15.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REW vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REW Sharpe Ratio is -1.56, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REW and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

REWIGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.56

3.07

-4.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.78

0.86

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.93

1.03

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.48

-1.27

Drawdowns

REW vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and IGM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

REWIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-65.59%

-34.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.25%

-16.44%

-49.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.76%

-26.39%

-60.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.62%

-40.68%

-52.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.79%

-40.68%

-59.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-0.84%

-99.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.88%

-15.23%

-71.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.60%

4.67%

+27.93%

Volatility

REW vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that REW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

REWIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

6.10%

+8.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

16.08%

+18.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.11%

20.43%

+21.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.64%

25.68%

+25.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

24.54%

+24.29%

REW vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

REW vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than IGM's 0.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF		0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology		11.04%6.69%5.68%5.97%0.65%0.00%0.27%1.80%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

REW and IGM have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REW has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs -45.16% for REW. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs -45.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REW.

REW has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.

REW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. REW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REW and 0.39% for IGM.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REW and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer