REW vs. CRMU
REW (ProShares UltraShort Technology) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - REW tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. REW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
REW vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REW
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- 6M
- -38.44%
- YTD
- -39.78%
- 1Y
- -51.65%
- 3Y*
- -41.91%
- 5Y*
- -36.52%
- 10Y*
- -43.85%
CRMU
- 1D
- -20.34%
- 1M
- -54.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REW vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | -39.56% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -83.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between REW and CRMU is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REW vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank
REW
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REW vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REW | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REW vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than CRMU's maximum drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REW | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -83.97% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -83.97% | -16.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -50.24% | -36.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.45% | — | — |
Volatility
REW vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REW | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.67% | 235.27% | -185.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.97% | 235.27% | -182.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.45% | 235.27% | -185.82% |
REW vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
REW vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REW ProShares UltraShort Technology | 8.27% | 6.69% | 5.68% | 5.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 1.80% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REW and CRMU have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REW.
REW has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
REW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (-200%), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REW and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for REW and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer