REVS vs. KWIN
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - REVS tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
REVS vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.66% return.
REVS
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REVS vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 16.36% | 4.38% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.66% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and KWIN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REVS vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REVS | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REVS vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -1.58% | -36.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.37% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -0.27% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility
REVS vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 4.14% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 4.14% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 4.14% | +14.87% |
REVS vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
REVS vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REVS and KWIN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for REVS and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer