REVG vs. FIGS
REVG (REV Group, Inc.) and FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) are both stocks. REVG operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, REVG returned 32.82%/yr vs -18.94%/yr for FIGS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REVG vs. FIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with REVG having a 5.08% return and FIGS slightly higher at 5.28%.
REVG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 42.35%
- 3Y*
- 89.79%
- 5Y*
- 32.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FIGS
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 129.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -18.94%
- 10Y*
- —
REVG vs. FIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVG REV Group, Inc. | 5.08% | 91.79% | 108.93% | 46.01% | -9.35% | -21.38% |
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 5.28% | 83.52% | -10.94% | 3.27% | -75.58% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVG and FIGS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.33 |
The correlation between REVG and FIGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
REVG:
$3.15B
FIGS:
$2.35B
REVG:
$1.93
FIGS:
$0.22
REVG:
33.05
FIGS:
54.44
REVG:
0.22
FIGS:
0.21
REVG:
1.28
FIGS:
3.32
REVG:
7.57
FIGS:
5.45
REVG:
$2.46B
FIGS:
$666.10M
REVG:
$369.80M
FIGS:
$443.68M
REVG:
$168.60M
FIGS:
$56.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVG vs. FIGS — Risk / Return Rank
REVG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FIGS
REVG vs. FIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REV Group, Inc. (REVG) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REVG | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.82 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 10.67 | -4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REVG vs. FIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVG drawdown since its inception was -88.07%, smaller than the maximum FIGS drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVG and FIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVG | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.07% | -92.77% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.48% | -34.11% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | -57.56% | +34.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.74% | -92.77% | +49.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -76.13% | +68.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -75.87% | +34.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.34% | 12.19% | -3.85% |
Volatility
REVG vs. FIGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REV Group, Inc. (REVG) is 0.00%, while FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that REVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVG | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 13.33% | -13.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 51.28% | -37.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.72% | 62.47% | -32.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 70.12% | -26.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.58% | 70.30% | -18.72% |
Dividends
REVG vs. FIGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither REVG nor FIGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REVG REV Group, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.39% | 10.07% | 1.10% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.64% | 2.66% | 0.46% |
Financials
REVG vs. FIGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between REV Group, Inc. and FIGS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
REVG vs. FIGS - Profitability Comparison
REVG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.60M and revenue of 664.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
FIGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
REVG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.60M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
FIGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
REVG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.90M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
FIGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
REVG and FIGS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIGS has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to REVG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVG dropped -88.07% vs FIGS's -92.77%.
FIGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVG and FIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer