RETL vs. URTY
RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) and URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RETL tracks the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%) while URTY tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RETL returned -3.60%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for URTY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RETL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URTY.
Performance
RETL vs. URTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than URTY's 52.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has underperformed URTY with an annualized return of -3.60%, while URTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.63% annualized return.
RETL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 30.06%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- -27.38%
- 10Y*
- -3.60%
URTY
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 52.87%
- 6M
- 39.91%
- 1Y
- 116.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- -7.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
RETL vs. URTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | -0.70% | -5.98% | 9.59% | 33.62% | -80.80% | 101.03% | 63.63% | 23.41% | -35.21% | -1.31% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 52.87% | 9.26% | 7.38% | 24.43% | -62.81% | 28.47% | -7.72% | 72.37% | -39.59% | 38.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RETL and URTY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between RETL and URTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RETL vs. URTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RETL
URTY
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RETL
URTY
Consumer Defensive
RETL
URTY
Communication Services
RETL
URTY
Technology
RETL
URTY
Healthcare
RETL
URTY
Energy
RETL
URTY
Basic Materials
RETL
-
URTY
Financial Services
RETL
-
URTY
Industrials
RETL
-
URTY
Real Estate
RETL
-
URTY
Utilities
RETL
-
URTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RETL vs. URTY — Risk / Return Rank
RETL
URTY
RETL vs. URTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RETL | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 3.60 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 11.78 | -10.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RETL vs. URTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum URTY drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and URTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RETL | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.00% | -88.09% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.08% | -32.56% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.72% | -65.85% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.00% | -82.76% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.00% | -88.09% | -3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.95% | -37.07% | -45.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -34.79% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.57% | 9.94% | +8.63% |
Volatility
RETL vs. URTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 16.60%, while ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a volatility of 21.54%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RETL | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 21.54% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.99% | 42.72% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.71% | 58.94% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.51% | 67.69% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.80% | 69.44% | +10.36% |
RETL vs. URTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than URTY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RETL vs. URTY - Dividend Comparison
RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than URTY's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.51% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 0.62% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RETL and URTY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URTY has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to RETL (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs URTY's -88.09%.
On 10-year performance, URTY leads with 8.63% vs -3.60% for RETL. On fees, URTY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, URTY has performed better with a 8.63% return vs -3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URTY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.
URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.
RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for URTY.
URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RETL and URTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer