RETL vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RETL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RETL returned 5.65% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. RETL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

RETL vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

RETL

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: -16.24%
• YTD: -2.25%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: -26.88%
• 10Y*: -5.15%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares	-2.25%	-5.98%	-9.94%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and SBIT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.34

Return for Risk

RETL vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL

RETL Risk / Return Rank: 12
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RETL	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.41	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.05	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.25	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	2.60	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	5.92	-5.63

RETL vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RETL vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RETL	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.00%	-91.35%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.08%	-47.94%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.21%	-77.15%	-6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.84%	-68.83%	+30.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.29%	21.04%	-1.75%

Volatility

RETL vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 19.36%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RETL	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.36%	22.98%	-3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.59%	68.89%	-26.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.13%	88.51%	-27.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.46%	96.89%	-17.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.94%	96.89%	-16.95%

RETL vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RETL vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares	0.51%	0.58%	1.13%	1.35%	0.71%	0.22%	0.19%	0.92%	1.19%	0.01%	2.60%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RETL and SBIT in my portfolio?

RETL and SBIT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RETL or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to RETL (19.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, RETL or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 5.65% for RETL. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 19.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RETL or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RETL or SBIT?

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RETL or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.

What is the main difference between RETL and SBIT?

RETL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.