PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. BRZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETL vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than BRZU's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RETL has outperformed BRZU with an annualized return of -3.60%, while BRZU has yielded a comparatively lower -15.10% annualized return.


RETL

1D
0.11%
1M
30.06%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-9.36%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
-27.38%
10Y*
-3.60%

BRZU

1D
1.74%
1M
-9.87%
YTD
14.47%
6M
11.16%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*
-15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETL vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-0.70%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-35.21%-1.31%
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
14.47%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and BRZU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.34

RETL vs. BRZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RETL
BRZU

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.2%

Communication Services

0.3%
2.2%

Technology

0.3%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.3%
2.4%

Energy

0.3%
18.7%

Basic Materials

-

13.7%

Financial Services

-

32.7%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RETL
14.0%
BRZU
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

RETL
3.9%
BRZU
4.2%

Communication Services

RETL
0.3%
BRZU
2.2%

Technology

RETL
0.3%
BRZU
0.9%

Healthcare

RETL
0.3%
BRZU
2.4%

Energy

RETL
0.3%
BRZU
18.7%

Basic Materials

RETL

-

BRZU
13.7%

Financial Services

RETL

-

BRZU
32.7%

Industrials

RETL

-

BRZU
10.9%

Real Estate

RETL

-

BRZU

-

Utilities

RETL

-

BRZU
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RETLBRZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

1.49

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

4.43

-3.35

RETL vs. BRZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the BRZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and BRZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RETL vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, smaller than the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and BRZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLBRZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-99.71%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.08%

-35.97%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.72%

-58.25%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-65.00%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

-98.11%

+6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.95%

-99.18%

+16.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-89.55%

+51.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.57%

12.06%

+6.51%

Volatility

RETL vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) at 14.76%. This indicates that RETL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETLBRZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

14.76%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.99%

39.95%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

50.10%

+10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.51%

55.45%

+24.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.80%

82.91%

-3.11%

RETL vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETL vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BRZU's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.33%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%0.00%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.51%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


RETL and BRZU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RETL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to BRZU (14.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETL dropped -92.00% vs BRZU's -99.71%.

On 10-year performance, RETL leads with -3.60% vs -15.10% for BRZU. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BRZU has been the lower-risk option at 14.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RETL has performed better with a -3.60% return vs -15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.

RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%), while BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RETL and 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETL and BRZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer