RESM vs. ROSC
RESM (Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RESM tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RESM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
RESM vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 18.77% return.
RESM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.07K | $10.89K | $7.66K | |
| $65.91K | $110.36K | $118.53K |
RESM vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 20.07% | -3.32% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 18.77% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESM and ROSC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESM vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
RESM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROSC
RESM vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESM | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESM vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESM | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -43.13% | +34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -1.64% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -7.13% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility
RESM vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESM | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 15.20% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 19.20% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 20.23% | -3.32% |
RESM vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESM vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ROSC's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.81% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESM and ROSC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RESM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RESM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.
RESM tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.34% for ROSC.
Find the right allocation for RESM and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer