PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RERFX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Real Estate Index Fund Class R-6 (RERFX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RERFX having a 12.30% return and PRRSX slightly lower at 12.29%. Over the past 10 years, RERFX has outperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return.


RERFX

1D
0.53%
1M
6.74%
YTD
12.30%
6M
15.02%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
9.15%

PRRSX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RERFX
American Funds Real Estate Index Fund Class R-6
12.30%29.26%2.96%16.02%-22.81%2.81%25.20%27.36%-17.37%31.10%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.29%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RERFX and PRRSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.49

The correlation between RERFX and PRRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RERFX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RERFX
RERFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RERFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RERFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Real Estate Index Fund Class R-6 (RERFX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RERFXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.10

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

1.53

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.73

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.71

5.95

+2.76

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RERFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RERFX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RERFXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.10

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.19

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.30

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Drawdowns

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RERFX drawdown since its inception was -53.80%, smaller than the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERFX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RERFXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.80%

-77.82%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-9.05%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-17.77%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.32%

-37.14%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-45.75%

+8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.11%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-13.09%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.62%

+0.70%

Volatility

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Real Estate Index Fund Class R-6 (RERFX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) at 4.33%. This indicates that RERFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RERFXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.33%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

10.18%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

14.26%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

20.20%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

21.87%

-4.93%

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RERFX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RERFX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

RERFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%
RERFX
American Funds Real Estate Index Fund Class R-6
12.41%13.93%4.90%3.90%1.98%10.14%0.38%3.10%3.11%4.94%1.58%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


RERFX and PRRSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RERFX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to PRRSX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERFX dropped -53.80% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

RERFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RERFX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer