RERCX vs. FAOSX
RERCX (American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RERCX returned 4.68%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RERCX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RERCX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- —
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERCX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 | 12.03% | 28.50% | 2.28% | 15.34% | -23.27% | 2.19% | 24.43% | 26.60% | -15.48% | 24.21% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RERCX and FAOSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RERCX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RERCX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
RERCX
FAOSX
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RERCX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.95 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | -0.34 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | -0.59 | +9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RERCX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | -0.27 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.23 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RERCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERCX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RERCX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -36.24% | -17.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -7.26% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -13.96% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -36.24% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.86% | +5.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -7.93% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.97% | -0.63% |
Volatility
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that RERCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RERCX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 0.00% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 4.08% | +8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 9.18% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 16.72% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 16.68% | +0.24% |
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RERCX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
RERCX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
RERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RERCX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 | 12.44% | 13.94% | 4.37% | 3.40% | 1.54% | 9.75% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 6.16% | 4.45% | 0.95% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RERCX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RERCX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERCX dropped -54.15% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
RERCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RERCX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer