RERCX vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
RERCX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Apr 16, 1984. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
RERCX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RERCX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERCX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 | -2.99% | 28.50% | 2.28% | 15.34% | -23.27% | 2.19% | 24.43% | 26.60% | -15.48% | 30.33% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 4.58% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RERCX achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RERCX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 7.58%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
RERCX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RERCX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RERCX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RERCX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
RERCX
SCHF
RERCX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RERCX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.76 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.40 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.75 | -1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 10.59 | -4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RERCX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.76 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.56 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.56 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between RERCX and SCHF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RERCX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
RERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%, more than SCHF's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERCX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 | 14.37% | 13.94% | 4.37% | 3.40% | 1.54% | 9.75% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 6.16% | 4.45% | 0.95% | 2.77% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
RERCX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RERCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERCX and SCHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RERCX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -34.87% | -19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -11.48% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.73% | -29.14% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.73% | -34.87% | -2.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -7.16% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -7.44% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 2.98% | +0.33% |
Volatility
RERCX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) is 7.26%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that RERCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RERCX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 7.94% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 11.79% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 17.75% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 16.14% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 17.09% | -0.30% |