PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RERCX vs. RERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RERCX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RERCX having a 11.45% return and RERGX slightly higher at 11.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RERCX having a 8.75% annualized return and RERGX not far ahead at 9.15%.


RERCX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
8.75%

RERGX

1D
0.24%
1M
6.36%
YTD
11.72%
6M
15.34%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RERCX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RERCX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3
11.45%28.50%2.28%15.34%-23.27%2.19%24.43%26.60%-15.48%30.33%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
11.72%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%31.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RERCX and RERGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

1.00

The correlation between RERCX and RERGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RERCX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RERCX
RERCX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RERCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RERCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RERCX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RERCXRERGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.91

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

2.72

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.31

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

8.75

-0.30

RERCX vs. RERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RERCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the RERGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RERCX and RERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RERCXRERGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.91

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.31

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.54

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Drawdowns

RERCX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RERCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, which is greater than RERGX's maximum drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERCX and RERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RERCXRERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.15%

-37.30%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-12.52%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-15.62%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.73%

-37.30%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.73%

-37.30%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-9.21%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.31%

+0.03%

Volatility

RERCX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3 (RERCX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RERCXRERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

5.43%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

12.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

15.41%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

16.67%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.93%

-0.01%

RERCX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RERCX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RERCX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison

RERCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, which matches RERGX's 12.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RERCX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund® Class R-3
12.51%13.94%4.37%3.40%1.54%9.75%0.00%2.56%6.16%4.45%0.95%2.77%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.49%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RERCX and RERGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RERCX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to RERGX (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERCX dropped -54.15% vs RERGX's -37.30%.

RERGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RERCX and RERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer