REPIX vs. UGPIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

REPIX (ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, REPIX returned 3.77%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for UGPIX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REPIX charges 1.55%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.

Performance

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund (REPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REPIX achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -44.26% return. Over the past 10 years, REPIX has underperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 3.77%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.

REPIX

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 15.57%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: -1.12%
• 10Y*: 3.77%

UGPIX

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -22.93%
• YTD: -44.26%
• 6M: -45.24%
• 1Y: -38.94%
• 3Y*: -12.92%
• 5Y*: -2.71%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REPIX ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund	15.57%	-1.98%	0.89%	10.34%	-38.59%	59.56%	-15.75%	41.02%	-9.97%	11.32%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	-44.26%	36.28%	-21.79%	785.09%	-53.03%	-73.86%	76.47%	40.07%	-46.51%	105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between REPIX and UGPIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.18

The correlation between REPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

REPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REPIX

REPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
REPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
REPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
REPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
REPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
REPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

UGPIX

UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund (REPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	-0.67	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	-0.81	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.91	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	-0.56	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	-1.09	+2.69

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REPIX drawdown since its inception was -91.23%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REPIX and UGPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	REPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.23%	-98.56%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.68%	-62.18%	+49.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.96%	-62.18%	+36.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.35%	-92.61%	+41.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.17%	-96.22%	+38.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.56%	-84.15%	+61.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-79.75%	+47.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	31.71%	-26.48%

Volatility

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund (REPIX) is 8.10%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that REPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	12.15%	-4.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.12%	37.16%	-21.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.45%	52.21%	-30.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.35%	388.15%	-359.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.69%	276.55%	-245.86%

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REPIX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

REPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

REPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than UGPIX's 10.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REPIX ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund	1.01%	1.23%	1.98%	1.43%	3.31%	12.77%	0.89%	2.57%	1.28%	0.00%	3.66%	0.17%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	10.85%	6.05%	2.91%	3.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REPIX and UGPIX in my portfolio?

REPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REPIX or UGPIX?

UGPIX has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to REPIX (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REPIX dropped -91.23% vs UGPIX's -98.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.